Hi - I’m Ryan. I am an attorney that is licensed to practice law in Missouri and my office is located in Springfield. My team has helped numerous sex abuse survivors obtain the compensation they deserve. I am looking forward to helping you find justice.
In a powerful display of resilience and determination, survivors of alleged abuse at the now-closed Circle of Hope Girls Ranch in Missouri are demanding justice. These former students and advocates are urging Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey to withhold plea deals and proceed with a trial for Stephanie Householder, co-owner of the controversial boarding school.
Circle of Hope Girls Ranch, a Christian boarding school for troubled teens in Cedar County, Missouri, has been at the center of a harrowing abuse scandal. Stephanie Householder, who ran the school alongside her husband Boyd Householder, faces 21 charges of child abuse and neglect based on allegations from former students. The case took a significant turn when Boyd Householder, who faced nearly 80 charges, including sexual abuse allegations, passed away due to a "cardiac incident" before facing trial.
Former students and advocates, including representatives from the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), have taken a stand against potential plea deals for Stephanie Householder. They delivered a letter to Attorney General Bailey, expressing their desire for a full trial to proceed.
David Clohessy, Missouri volunteer director for SNAP, voiced concerns that the attorney general might offer Householder another plea deal, following a rejected offer in 2023. However, the attorney general's office has stated that there are currently "no pending offers of a plea deal."
The possibility of a plea deal has deeply affected survivors of the alleged abuse. Maggie Drew, a former resident of Circle of Hope from 2007 to 2013, described the prospect of a plea deal as "a huge slap in the face." Drew recounted her traumatic experiences at the ranch, including suffering broken bones and being told to "walk it off" by Householder.
Amanda Householder, Stephanie's daughter, wrote a letter on behalf of a group of survivors, emphasizing the importance of a trial:
"While the trial will be emotionally very hard for many of us in the short term, in the long run, we are convinced that it will be a powerful deterrent to others who might commit or conceal crimes against children."
This case has shed light on the broader issue of oversight in Christian boarding schools for troubled teens. Advocates are calling for more rigorous investigations into similar institutions across Missouri and beyond.
Adria Keim, a former employee at Circle of Hope, described the environment as "manipulative" and inconsistent with its Christian affiliation. Her testimony highlights the need for greater scrutiny of such facilities.
Stephanie Householder is currently scheduled for a jury trial in October. The attorney general's office has emphasized that Bailey only intervenes in criminal cases when appointed by the governor or local authorities. Advocates are not limiting their efforts to this single case. They are also reaching out to county sheriffs, urging local investigations into similar facilities across the state.
Clohessy stressed the importance of a trial in allowing survivors to "speak their truth" and inform the public beyond what has already been reported. This case serves as a crucial opportunity to raise awareness about the potential for abuse in boarding school settings and the need for robust oversight mechanisms.
The Circle of Hope Ranch abuse case represents a critical juncture in the fight against institutional child abuse. As survivors push for a full trial, their actions highlight the ongoing need for vigilance, accountability, and support for those who have experienced abuse in residential school settings.
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for how similar institutions are monitored and how abuse allegations are handled in the future. It underscores the importance of giving survivors a voice and ensuring that justice is served, not just for the individuals involved but as a deterrent to prevent future abuses.
Ryan Frazier, Esq. of Monsees & Mayer P.C. offers the following legal perspective on the Circle of Hope Ranch case:
"The survivors' call for a trial in the Circle of Hope Ranch case is a testament to the courage and determination of those who have endured abuse. From a legal standpoint, while plea deals can be efficient in resolving cases, they sometimes fall short in providing the closure and justice that survivors seek.
A trial offers several advantages in cases of institutional abuse. Firstly, it allows for a full public airing of the evidence, which can be crucial for both individual healing and broader societal awareness. Secondly, the trial process can uncover additional information that might not come to light in plea negotiations, potentially leading to more comprehensive justice.
Moreover, the precedent set by a trial and potential conviction can have a significant deterrent effect on other institutions and individuals who might be tempted to abuse their power. It sends a clear message that such actions will be thoroughly investigated and prosecuted. However, it's important to note that trials can be emotionally taxing for survivors who may need to testify. Proper support systems must be in place to assist them through this process.
In terms of broader implications, this case highlights the urgent need for stronger oversight of residential schools and similar institutions. Legislators and law enforcement agencies should consider implementing more rigorous inspection regimes and clearer reporting mechanisms for abuse allegations.
As we move forward, it's crucial that we continue to support survivors, advocate for transparency, and work towards creating safer environments for vulnerable youth. The legal system plays a vital role in this process, and cases like Circle of Hope Ranch can serve as catalysts for meaningful change."
Source: